By Ananya Sharma 
Chennai, March 31: Piyush Goyal flew into Chennai on Tuesday with a document, a podium, and a point to make. The Union Minister, who also happens to be the BJP’s election in-charge for Tamil Nadu, stood before cameras and released what his party is calling a “chargesheet” against the DMK government. Flanked by K. Annamalai, Nainar Nagenthran, and Tamilisai Soundararajan, he announced that this election would be a “turning point” in Tamil Nadu’s history.
It is the kind of language politicians reach for when they need the moment to feel bigger than they are. Whether it actually becomes a turning point depends entirely on what Tamil Nadu’s voters make of all this when they walk into booths on April 23.
When Numbers Do the Talking
The BJP’s chargesheet was built around data: crime figures, corruption estimates, unfulfilled promises. The choice is deliberate. In a state where the party has never cracked the assembly arithmetic, Goyal is not trying to win on sentiment. He is trying to win with anger.
The POCSO numbers were front and centre. According to Goyal, cases under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act rose from 4,968 in 2022 to 6,969 in 2024. He did not present this as a law-and-order statistic. He made it personal, accusing DMK councillors and youth wing leaders of involvement in sexual offences and questioning whether the “father-son duo” at the top had deliberately looked the other way. That is a serious allegation. It was made at a press conference, not in a courtroom, but in election season, that distinction often gets lost in the noise.
Law and order has historically been an issue that cuts across caste lines in Tamil Nadu, reaching voters who would otherwise never consider voting for the BJP. If the party can make enough people feel unsafe under the current government, it gains something regardless of how many seats it ultimately wins. The chargesheet also alleged roughly 8,900 murders and 32 custodial deaths during the DMK’s five-year tenure. The custodial death figure, in particular, carries a different kind of weight in this state. The 2020 deaths of P. Jayaraj and J. Bennix in Thoothukudi are not forgotten here. Any invocation of police brutality still draws a visceral response from large sections of Tamil society.
Sand, Liquor, and Rs 1 Lakh Crore
Then came the money.
Goyal alleged a Rs 4,700 crore scam in illegal sand mining and claimed irregularities worth a staggering Rs 1 lakh crore in TASMAC operations. He also pointed to alleged corruption in highway tenders and municipal administration, arguing these directly hurt ordinary livelihoods.
Sand mining corruption is not a new allegation in Tamil Nadu. It has surfaced under previous governments, too. But its persistence as a talking point reflects a real grievance, one that affects farmers, construction workers, and anyone who has had to deal with the bureaucratic machinery of getting materials for a building project. It is not abstract corruption. People feel it.
TASMAC is something else entirely. The state’s liquor retail monopoly sits at the uncomfortable intersection of public health, state revenue, and a prohibition debate that Tamil Nadu has never quite resolved. When you attach a figure like Rs 1 lakh crore to it, you are not just alleging financial wrongdoing. You are reopening every conversation about liquor policy that the DMK has been trying to manage quietly for five years. Whether Goyal’s figure holds up to scrutiny is a separate matter. In the remaining weeks before polling day, scrutiny is harder to come by than headlines.
The Unfulfilled Promises Section Nobody Should Skip
If the crime and corruption data were designed to provoke outrage, the broken-promises section was designed to produce something quieter and perhaps more damaging: disappointment.
According to the chargesheet, 70% of the DMK’s 2021 poll promises remain unfulfilled. No LPG subsidy. Fuel prices unchanged. Student education loans are not waived. And over 3.57 lakh vacant government posts are left sitting empty.
That last one is worth pausing on. Government employment is not just a policy issue in Tamil Nadu. For millions of families, particularly those outside Chennai, it is the primary route to stability. A first-generation graduate preparing for a state recruitment exam, waiting years for results that keep getting delayed, knows exactly what 3.57 lakh vacant posts mean. It means the system kept them waiting. Goyal did not invent this grievance. He found it sitting there and gave it a number.
The Man Standing Next to Goyal
There was an elephant in the room at Tuesday’s press conference, and its name was K. Annamalai.
Annamalai has spent roughly the last two years doing the kind of grassroots work that most national party leaders in Tamil Nadu never bother with. He travelled to districts that others flew over. He built genuine name recognition in places that had previously treated the BJP as a northern imposition. He wanted to contest from Singanallur in Coimbatore. That seat was not allotted to the BJP in the final NDA arrangement. He flew to Chennai, met Goyal, and emerged looking like a man who had received difficult news.
To reporters, he said he had never asked anyone for a seat and was simply doing his work as a party worker. Very few people who heard that quite believed it.
And yet there he was on Tuesday, standing alongside Goyal as the chargesheet was unveiled. Party discipline held. What it cost him personally is a different question, one that his expression was not giving away.
His absence from the ballot is a genuine setback for the BJP’s campaign in ways that will become clearer as April 23 approaches. The party is contesting only 27 seats under its NDA arrangement with the AIADMK. That makes Goyal’s press conference less about winning constituencies and more about setting a statewide narrative, hoping that conversations triggered by the chargesheet travel into booths where BJP candidates are not even on the ballot.
Stalin Was Already on the Road
On the same day Goyal was presenting his chargesheet in Chennai, Chief Minister M.K. Stalin was in Thiruvarur, the hometown of the late DMK patriarch M. Karunanidhi, effectively launching his own campaign from ground soaked in party history. He told the crowd the DMK had already unveiled its “superstar manifesto” and asked voters directly whether victory was confirmed.
The contrast was almost cinematic. The challenger presented a list of failures in a press conference. The incumbent is standing in his political heartland, speaking to a crowd that already knows which side it is on.
Stalin is betting on machine and momentum. His party’s candidate list includes 60 new faces alongside the familiar names, a signal that the DMK is trying to look fresh without abandoning what has worked. Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin was simultaneously campaigning in the Dharmapuri area, an acknowledgement that the party needs to fight on multiple fronts simultaneously.
The DMK has incumbency and organisation. What it is fighting against, at least partly, is a narrative that five years of power has produced complacency.
The Third Corner of This Triangle
No reading of this election is complete without Vijay.
The Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam chief, the actor who stepped away from one of the most successful film careers in Tamil cinema to try something genuinely difficult, announced last Sunday that he would contest from two constituencies: Perambur in north Chennai and Tiruchirappalli East. He filed his nomination as C. Joseph Vijay, his full name, which itself felt like a statement: this is not a film promotion.
Perambur is a working-class constituency with over 2.20 lakh voters, a socially diverse electorate that includes a substantial Dalit population. The DMK has held it since 2019, and Vijay will face the sitting MLA RD Sekar directly. In Trichy East, he goes up against Inigo Irudayaraj, another DMK incumbent.
He has framed the election as a straight two-way contest between TVK and the DMK, calling Stalin’s coalition a “patch-up alliance” held together by political convenience rather than shared purpose. His promises lean into youth anxiety: a drug-free Tamil Nadu, collateral-free education loans of up to Rs 20 lakh, transparent government recruitment, and monthly financial assistance for graduates and diploma holders.
Whether star power converts into assembly seats against the kind of entrenched machinery that the DMK has built over decades is the defining question of this election. TVK is contesting all 234 seats without any major alliance behind it. That is either brave or reckless, depending on what happens on May 4 when the votes are counted.
What It All Adds Up To
Goyal’s chargesheet, in the end, is an attempt to reframe what Tamil Nadu is actually voting on. The BJP wants this to be a referendum on five years of DMK governance rather than a contest of Dravidian identities, alliance arithmetic, or star power. That is the only terrain on which the party can compete meaningfully in a state where its cultural roots remain shallow.
The strategy might work in the margins. It might shift a conversation, harden a grievance, tip a seat or two in the BJP’s direction. Or it might not travel beyond the press conference room into the lived reality of constituencies where voters have already made up their minds.
Tamil Nadu has a habit of surprising people. All three sides in this fight seem to sense it. None of them is holding anything back.
Stay ahead with Hindustan Herald — bringing you trusted news, sharp analysis, and stories that matter across Politics, Business, Technology, Sports, Entertainment, Lifestyle, and more.
Connect with us on Facebook, Instagram, X (Twitter), LinkedIn, YouTube, and join our Telegram community @hindustanherald for real-time updates.
Covers Indian politics, governance, and policy developments with over a decade of experience in political reporting.
- Ananya Sharma
- Ananya Sharma
- Ananya Sharma
- Ananya Sharma
Ayesha Khan and Ananya Sharma